CVE-2026-67324

Signals

NVD · CVE-2026-7726 · 6.5 · The Layouts for WPBakery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized actions due to a missing capability check on the `Layouts_WPB_Remote::template_sync(NVD · CVE-2026-7693 · 7.2 · The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to OS Command Injection in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.5.1 due to insufficient sanitization oNVD · CVE-2026-7520 · 8.1 · The MailChimp Forms by MailMunch plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the `sign_in()` anNVD · CVE-2026-7444 · 8.1 · The Search Analytics for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.16. This is due to missinCISA KEV · CVE-2026-18556 · 7.4 · N-able N-central Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability · Added 2026-08-04 · Due 2026-08-07CISA KEV · CVE-2026-34486 · 7.5 · Apache Tomcat Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data Vulnerability · Added 2026-08-04 · Due 2026-08-07NVD · CVE-2026-7726 · 6.5 · The Layouts for WPBakery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized actions due to a missing capability check on the `Layouts_WPB_Remote::template_sync(NVD · CVE-2026-7693 · 7.2 · The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to OS Command Injection in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.5.1 due to insufficient sanitization oNVD · CVE-2026-7520 · 8.1 · The MailChimp Forms by MailMunch plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the `sign_in()` anNVD · CVE-2026-7444 · 8.1 · The Search Analytics for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.16. This is due to missinCISA KEV · CVE-2026-18556 · 7.4 · N-able N-central Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability · Added 2026-08-04 · Due 2026-08-07CISA KEV · CVE-2026-34486 · 7.5 · Apache Tomcat Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data Vulnerability · Added 2026-08-04 · Due 2026-08-07

CVE Database · CVE-2026-67324

CVE-2026-67324

· CRITICALReceived

CVSS v3.1

9.8

CVSS v4.0

9.3

EPSS

0.38%

Published

Aug 1, 2026

Modified

Aug 5, 2026

Public PoC / Exploit

All weaponized →

No public PoC or exploit code indexed for this CVE.

Links to public security research (Exploit-DB, Nuclei, Trickest, GitHub) for defensive use only.

Description

GitPython 3.1.50 fails to recognize joined short-option forms such as -u<value> (the short form of --upload-pack=<value>) when enforcing its default unsafe-option gate. When an application passes attacker-influenced clone options into Repo.clone_from(..., multi_options=..., allow_unsafe_options=False), an attacker can supply -u<helper> to bypass the gate that blocks --upload-pack/-u, causing Git to execute the specified helper command during clone. Fixed in 3.1.51.

CVSS Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Weaknesses (CWE)

CWE-78

References (3)

https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-v396-v7q4-x2qj

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitpython-authentication-bypass-via-joined-short-options

https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-v396-v7q4-x2qj

KEV Catalog EPSS Scores Vendors All CVEs